Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A synthesis of theoretical models to guide decision support interventions for surrogate decision-making at adult end-of-life

James Dionne-Odom, Marie Bakitas


Background: Surrogate decision-makers (SDMs) take part in 1.5 million end-of-life (EOL) decisions per year. Most surrogates find the role burdensome, often do make decisions concordant with patients’ wishes and suffer negative psychological after-effects months to years subsequently. 

Objective: To review the literature and synthesize theoretical models of surrogate decision-making at adult EOL to identify an explanatory foundation for decision support interventions. 

Design: Literature published up to December 2011 was reviewed using PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE using the search terms “surrogate,” “proxy,” “end-of-life,” “life support withdrawal/withholding” and “decision-making”. 

Study selection: Selection criteria included: (a) studies or integrative reports of the empirical and theoretical research relevant to EOL surrogate decision-making; (b) description of a model of how SDMs make decisions for decisionally-incapacitated adults at EOL and (c) diagrammatic depictions of SDM models specifying key concepts and theoretical relationships. 

Results: Eight theoretical models met the selection criteria.

Data synthesis: Five key insights were that: 1) more consistency is needed between diagrammatic maps of surrogate decision-making and model descriptions; 2) models focused on description of concepts with a lesser focus on relational linkages and propositions; 3) there is a need for greater integration of ethical concepts and their relationships in conceptual maps; 4) there has been little emphasis on how theoretical frameworks might guide intervention development and 5) minimal attempts have been made to situate surrogate decision-making within a grander conceptual framework of decision-making. 

Conclusions: Several theories of surrogate decision-making at adult EOL have been proposed, but further theory development is needed for these models to serve as the foundation for designing decision support interventions.

Full Text:



Buckey, J. & Abell, N. (2010). Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions: A Social Work Response to Meet Needs of Health Care Surrogates. Journal of Social Work in End-of-life and Palliative Care 6 (1-2) 27-50.

Beauchamp, T. & Childress, J. (2009). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Sixth ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

Buchanan, A. & Brock, D. (1990). Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Jonsen, A. (1998). The Birth of Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Berger, J., DeRenzo, E. & Schwartz, J. (2008). Surrogate Decision Making: Reconciling Ethical Theory and Clinical Practice. Annals of Internal Medicine 149 (1) 48-53.

Shapiro, S. (2007). When Life Imitates Art: Surrogate Decision Making at the End of Life. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 14 (4) 80-92.

Dionne-Odom, J. & Bakitas, M. (2012). Why Surrogates Don't Make Decisions the Way We Think They Ought To: Insights from Moral Psychology. Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing 14 (2) 99-106.

Pruchno, R.A. (2006). Predictors of Patient Treatment Preferences and Spouse Substituted Judgments: The Case of Dialysis Continuation. Medical Decision Making 26 (2) 112-121.

Fried, T.R., Bradley, E. & Towle, V.R. (2003). Valuing the Outcomes of Treatment: Do Patients and Their Caregivers Agree? Archives of Internal Medicine 163 (17) 2073-2078.

Shalowitz, D.I., Garrett-Mayer, E. & Wendler, D. (2006). The Accuracy of Surrogate Decision Makers: a systematic review. Archives of Internal Medicine 166 (5) 493-497.

Phillips, W.T., Alexander, J.L., Pepin, V. & Riley, C. (2003). Cardiac Rehabilitation Patient Versus Proxy Quality-of-Life Perceptions. Clinical Nursing Research 12 (3) 282-293.

Marks, M.A.Z. & Arkes, H.R. (2008). Patient and Surrogate Disagreement in End-of-Life Decisions: Can Surrogates Accurately Predict Patients' Preferences? Medical Decision Making 28 (4) 524-531.

Ditto, P.H., Danks, J.H., Smucker, W.D., Bookwala, J., Coppola, K.M., Dresser, R., Fagerlin, A., Gready, R.M., Houts, R.M., Lockhart, L.K. & Zyzanski, S. (2001). Advance Directives as Acts of Communication: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Archives of Internal Medicine 161 (3) 421-430.

Fagerlin, A., Ditto, P.H., Danks, J.H. & Renate, M.H. (2001). Projection in Surrogate Decisions About Life-Sustaining Medical Treatments. Health Psychology 20 (3) 166-175.

Radwany, S., Albanese, T., Clough, L., Sims, L., Mason, H. & Jahangiri, S. (2009). End-of-life Decision Making and Emotional Burden: Placing Family Meetings in Context. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care 26 (5) 376-383.

Charles, C., Gafni, A., Whelan, T. & O'Brien, M.A. (2005). Treatment decision aids: conceptual issues and future directions. Health Expectations 8 (2) 114-125.

Elwyn, G., Stiel, M., Durand, M-A. & Boivin, J. (2011). The design of patient decision support interventions: addressing the theory-practice gap. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 17 (4) 565-574.

Fawcett, J. (1999). The Relationship of Theory and Research. Third ed. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.

Shadish, W., Cook, T. & Campbell, D. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Belmont: Wadsworth.

Burns, N. & Grove, S. (2009). The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence. Sixth ed. St. Louis: Saunders Elsevier.

Fawcett, J. (2005). Criteria for Evaluation of Theory. Nursing Science Quarterly 18 (2) 131-135.

Conn, V., Rantz, M., Wipke-Tevis, D. & Maas, M. (2001). Designing Effective Nursing Interventions. Research in Nursing and Health 24 (5) 433-442.

Wu, H-L. & Volker, D. (2009). The use of theory in qualitative approaches to research: application in end-of-life studies. Journal of Advanced Nursing 65 (12) 2719-2732.

Caron, C., Griffith, J. & Arcand, M. (2005). End-of-life decision making in dementia: The perspective of family caregivers. Dementia 4 (1) 113-136.

Colclough, Y. & Young, H. (2007). Decision Making at End of Life Among Japanese American Families. Journal of Family Nursing 13 (2) 201-225.

Limerick, M. (2007). The Process Used by Surrogate Decision Makers to Withhold and Withdraw Life-Sustaining Measures in an Intensive Care Environment. Oncology Nursing Forum 34 (2) 331-339.

Meeker, M.A. & Jezewski, M.A. (2009). Metasynthesis: withdrawing life-sustaining treatments: the experience of family decision-makers. Journal of Clinical Nursing 18 (2) 163-173.

White, D. (2011). Rethinking Interventions to Improve Surrogate Decision Making in Intensive Care Units. American Journal of Critical Care 20 (3) 252-257.

Wiegand, D., Deatrick, J. & Knafl, K. (2008). Family Management Styles Related to Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapy From Adults Who Are Acutely Ill or Injured. Journal of Family Nursing 14 (1) 16-32.

Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with Case Studies. Academy of Management Journal 50 (1) 20-24.

Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research. Third ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Inc.

Angus, D., Barnato, A., Linde-Zwirble, W., Weissfeld, L., Watson, S., Rickert, T., Rubenfeld, G.D. & Robert Wood Johnson Foundation ICI End-of-Life Peer Group. (2004). Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: An epidemiologic study. Critical Care Medicine 32 (3) 638-643.

Henly, S., Wyman, J. & Findorff, M. (2011). Health and Illness Over Time: The Trajectory Perspective in Nursing Science. Nursing Research 60 (Supplement 3) S5-14.



  • There are currently no refbacks.