Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Why, in medicine, evidence is still more important than narratives or values? Or “The importance of being evident.”

Marie-Caroline Schulte


The importance of being evident is what counts for medicine. The diagnosis must be evident and the treatment must be based on evidence. If that evidence is and always must be based on statistics, as we have seen, it becomes questionable. Evidence is good when it is robust and when it fits the individual patient. Only then does evidence-based medicine (EBM), make sense and only then the patient can be sure to be treated in the best possible way. EBM, the movement of medicine that is strictly based on evidence which is judged in a hierarchical order, is under scrutiny and heavily criticised, chiefly because it has lost the patient out of its focus. Numbers are more important than the individual diagnosis and treatment is administered according to population-based statistics and not ‘made to order’. Although this criticism is very valid, the solution cannot be to simply replace EBM with something else, but the solution must be to still base medicine and medical treatment on the best available evidence we have, while putting the patient back into focus. In order to do so, it is important to topple evidence hierarchies, to divide EBM into research and practice and to acknowledge that sometimes the statistical best evidence is not the best evidential treatment for the actual patient.


Evidence-based medicine, evidence-based practice, evidence-based research, evidence hierarchies, GRADE, guidelines, knowledge tools, narrative-based medicine, person-centered healthcare, shared decision-making, values-based medicine

Full Text:



Singh, S. & Edzard, E. (2008). Trick or Treatment? Alternative medicine on trial. London: Transworld Publishers.

Goldenberg, M.J. (2006) On evidence and evidence-based medicine: lessons from the philosophy of science. Social Science and Medicine 62, 2621-2632.

Grol, R. & Grimshaw, J. (2003). From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet 362, 1225-1230.

Shah, S. (2008). Am Menschen getestet! Wie die Pharmaindustrie die Ärmsten der Welt für Medikamententests missbraucht. München: Redline.

Evidence-based Medicine Working Group. (1992). Evidence-Based Medicine. A New Approach to Teaching the Practice of Medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association 268, 2420-2425.

Solomon, M. (2015). Making Medical Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goldberger, J. & Buxton, A. (2013). Personalized Medicine vs. Guideline-Based Medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association 309 (24) 2559-2560.

Bluhm, R. & Borgerson, K. (2011). Evidence based medicine. In: Handbook of the Philosophy of medicine. Vol. 16, Philosophy of Medicine. Amsterdam, Boston, Heidelberg: Elsevier.

Greenhalgh, T., Howick, J., Maskrey, N. & Evidence Based Medicine Renaissance Group. (2014). Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis. British Medical Journal 348, g3725.

Howick, J. (2011). The philosophy of Evidence-based Medicine. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.

Salzburg Statement on Shared Decision Making. (2011). British Medical Journal 342, d1745.

Hay, C., Weisner, T.S., Subramanian, S., Duan, N., Niedzinski, E.J. & Kravitz, R.L. (2008). Harnessing experience: exploring the gap between evidence-based medicine and clinical practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14, 707-713.

Elwyn, G., Wieringa, S. & Greenhalgh, T. (2016). Clinical encounters in the post-guidelines era. British Medical Journal 353, i3200.

Greenhalgh, T. (1999). Narrative based medicine in an evidence based world. British Medical Journal 318, 323-325.

Hurwitz, B., Greenhalgh, T. & Skultans, V. (Eds.). (2004). Narrative Research in Health and Illness. Oxford: BMJ Books, Blackwell Publishing.

Kelly, M.P., Heath, I., Howick, J. & Greenhalgh, T. (2015). The importance of values for evidence-based medicine. BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1) 69.

Fulford, B., Peile, E. & Carroll, H. (2012). Essential Values-Based Practice. Clinical Stories Linking Science with People. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Loughlin, M. (Ed.). (2014). Debates in Values-Based Practice. Arguments for and against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Evans, I., Thornton, H., Chalmers, I. & Glasziou, P. (2011). Testing Treatments: Better Research for Better Healthcare. London: The British Library.

Oxford Centre of Evidence-based Medicine - Levels of Evidence (March 2009). Available at: (last accessed on March 24th, 2017).

Rogers, W. (2004) Evidence-Based Medicine and Women: Do the principles and practice of EBM further women’s health? Bioethics 18 (1) 50-71.

Goldet, G. & Howick, J. (2013). Understanding GRADE: an introduction. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine 6 (1) 50-54.

Montori, V. & Gyatt, G. (2008). Progress in Evidence-Based Medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association 300 (15) 1814-1816.

Miles, S. (2004). The Hippocratic Oath and the Ethics of Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.



  • There are currently no refbacks.