Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Theory based analysis of the effects of decision aids for surgery in early breast cancer: a systematic review

Stephanie Sivell, Adrian Edwards, Antony SR Manstead, Ben Carter, Natalie Joseph-Williams, Lisa JM Caldon, Alison Clements, Karen Collins, Anne Donald, Malcolm WR Reed, Glyn Elwyn (on behalf of the BresDex Group)

Abstract


Rationale, aims and objectives: Little is understood about how decision aids achieve their reported effects or their impact on the decision-making process. We aimed to evaluate the quality of decision aids for women choosing surgery for early breast cancer and to examine how their reported effects may reflect the contribution of components suggested by an extended Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) and the Common Sense Model of Illness Representations (CSM) to be required for good quality decision-making in this domain.

Method: We undertook a systematic review to examine the components of decision aids that influence decision-making processes for women choosing surgery for early breast cancer. The quality and theoretical underpinnings of the decision aids were appraised and reported outcomes meta-analysed.

Results: Ten decision aids were obtained; 4 had been evaluated in randomised trials. The quality of the decision aids was similar, with limited evidence of theoretical base. Data linking decision aid components, design, use and outcomes to judge the effects on the decision-making process were inconsistent. Two trials suggested evidence of a reduction in Decision Conflict scores (SMD = -0.35, 95% CI -0.57 to -0.12, p = 0.002). Improvements in knowledge (4 trials) and trends towards breast conservation surgery (3 trials) were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: A greater understanding of how decision aids impact on the decision-making process is needed if we are to design improved interventions that are effective on the core aspects of decision-making in this domain.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Elwyn, G., Frosch, D. & Rollnick, S. (2009). Dual equipoise shared decision-making: definitions for decision and behaviour support interventions. Implementation Science 4, 75.

O'Connor, A.M., Bennett, C.L., Stacey, D., et al. (2009). Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions (review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (3): CD001431.

Association of Breast Surgery at BASO. (2009). Surgical guidelines for the management of breast cancer. European

Journal of Surgical Oncology 35 (Supplement 1) S1-S22.

Kaufmann, M., Morrow, M., von Minckwitz, G., Harris, J.R. & Biedenkopf Expert Panel Members. (2010). Locoregional treatment of primary breast cancer: consensus recommendations from an International Expert Panel. Cancer 116, 1184-1191.

Fisher, B., Anderson, S., Bryant, J., Margolese, R.G., Deutsch, M., Fisher, E.R., Jong-Hyeon, J. & Wolmark, N. (2002). Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 347, 1233-1241.

Pockaj, B.A., Degnim, A.C., Boughey, J.C., Gray, R.J., McLaughlin, S.A., Dueck, A.C., Perez, E.A., Halyard, M.Y., Frost, M.H., Cheville, A.L. & Sloan, J.A. (2009). Quality of life after breast cancer surgery: What have we learned and where should we go next? Journal of Surgical Oncology 99, 447-455.

Jatoi, I. & Proschan, M.A. (2005). Randomized trials of breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy for primary breast cancer: a pooled analysis of updated results. American Journal of Clinical Oncology 28, 289-294.

Caldon, L.J., Collins, K.A., Wilde, D.J., Ahmedzai, S.H., Noble, T.W., Stotter, A., Sibbering, D.M., Holst, S. & Reed, M.W. (2011). Why do hospital mastectomy rates vary? Differences in the decision-making experiences of

women with breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer 104, 1551-1557.

Molenaar, S., Oort, F., Sprangers, M., Rutgers, E., Luiten, E., Mulder, J. & de Haes, H. (2004). Predictors of patients' choices for breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy: a prospective study. British Journal of Cancer 90, 2123-2130.

Collins, E.D., Moore, C.P., Clay, K.F., Kearing, S.A., O’Connor, A.M., Llewellyn-Thomas, H.A., Barth, R.J. Jr. & Sepucha, K.R. (2009). Can women with early-stage breast cancer make an informed decision for mastectomy? Journal of Clinical Oncology 27, 519-525.

Waljee, J.F., Rogers, M.A. & Alderman, A.K. (2007). Decision aids and breast cancer: do they influence choice for surgery and knowledge of treatment options? Journal of Clinical Oncology 25, 1067-1073.

Bekker, H.L., Hewison, J. & Thornton, J.G. (2003). Understanding why decision aids work: linking process with outcome. Patient Education and Counseling 50, 323-329.

Sepucha, K., Ozanne, E., Silvia, K., Partridge, A. & Mulley, A.G.J. (2007). An approach to measuring the quality of breast cancer decisions. Patient Education and Counseling 65, 261-269.

Elwyn, G., Elwyn, B. & Miron-Shatz, T. (2009). Measuring 'decision quality': irresolvable difficulties and an alternative proposal. In: Shared-Decision Making in Health Care: Achieving Evidence-Based Patient Choice 2nd ed. (A. Edwards & G. Elwyn, eds.), pp 143-149. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Elwyn, G. & Miron-Shatz, T. (2010). Deliberation before determination: the definition and evaluation of good decision making. Health Expectations 13, 139-147.

Feldman-Stewart, D. & Brundage, M.D. (2004). Challenges for designing and implementing decision aids. Patient

Education and Counseling 54, 265-273.

Michie, S., Johnston, M., Francis, J., Hardeman, W. & Eccles, M. (2008). From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Applied Psychology 57, 660-680.

Durand, M-A., Stiel, M., Boivin, J. & Elwyn, G. (2008). Where is the theory? Evaluating the theoretical frameworks described in decision support technologies. Patient Education and Counseling 71, 125-135.

Sivell, S., Edwards, A., Elwyn, G. & Manstead, A.S.R. (2011). Understanding surgery choices for breast cancer: how might the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Common Sense Model contribute to decision support interventions? Health Expectations 14, 6-19.

Conner, M. & Norman, P. (2005). Predicting health behaviour: a social cognition approach. In: Predicting Health Behaviour: Research Practice with Social Cognition Models. 2nd edn. (M. Conner & P. Norman, eds.), pp 1-27. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behaviour. In: Action-control: From Cognition to

Behavior (J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann eds.), pp 11-39. Heidelberg: Spring.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 50,

-211.

Leventhal, H., Meyer, D. & Nerenz, D. (1980). The common-sense model of illness representation danger. In: Medical

Psychology Volume 2 (S. Rachman, ed.), pp 7-30. New York: Pergamon Press.

Temple, W.J., Russell, M.L., Parsons, L.L., Huber, S.M., Jones, C.A., Bankes, J. & Eliasziw, M. (2006). Conservation surgery for breast cancer as the preferred choice: a prospective analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology 24, 3367-3373.

Sandberg, T. & Conner, M. (2008). Anticipated regret as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: A

meta-analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology 47, 589-606.

Frosch, D.L., Légaré, F. & Fishbein, M. (2009). Adjuncts or adversaries to shared decision making? Applying the Integrative Model of Behavior to the role and design of decision support interventions in health care interactions. Implementation Science 4. 75.

Williams, L., Jones, W., Elwyn, G. & Edwards, A. (2008). Interactive patient decision aids for women facing genetic testing for familial breast cancer: a systematic web and literature review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14, 70-74.

Ottawa A to Z Inventory - Patient Decision Aids. (http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/AZinvent.php)

Elwyn, G., O'Connor, A., Stacey, D., et al. (2006). Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids:

online international Delphi consensus process. British Medical Journal 333, 417.

Elwyn, G., O'Connor, A.M., Bennett, C., et al. (2009) Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi). PLoS ONE 4, e4705.

Joseph-Williams, N., Newcombe, R., Politi, M., et al. Toward minimum standards for certifying patient decision aids: correlation analysis and modified Delphi consensus process. Medical Decision Making In press.

SPSS 16.0 for Windows, Release 16.0.2 (Apr 10, 2008).

The Cochrane Collaboration. (2008). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.0.2 (updated September 2009). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

The Cochrane Collaboration. (2008). Review Manager 5. 5.0 edition. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre.

DerSimonian, R. & Laird, N. (1986). Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 7, 177-188.

Mallick, U., Bakhai, A., Wang, D. & Flather, M. (2006). Cluster Randomized Trials. In: Clinical Trials: A Practical

Guide to Design, Analysis and Reporting. (D. Wang & A. Bakhai, eds.), pp 141-151. London, Chicago: Remedica.

O'Connor, A. (1995). Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Medical Decision Making 15, 25-30.

Early Stage Breast Cancer: Surgery Choices. (http://www.healthcrossroads.org/).

Making decisions about the removal of my breast cancer: what do I prefer? (http://web.archive.org/web/20070618154733/http://www.cancer.ca/ccs/internet/miniapp/0,2939,3543_16897665_1

_langId-en,00.html).

Healthwise Breast Cancer (Should I have breast-conserving surgery or a mastectomy to treat early-stage breast cancer?) (http://www.healthwise.net/preferredcare/Content/StdDocument.aspx?DOCHWID=tv6530&SECHWID=tv6530- Intro).

A Patchwork of Life: One Woman's Story. For Women Making Breast Cancer Treatment Decisions

(http://www.bcm.edu/patchworkoflife/homepage_en.htm?CFID=198180636&CFTOKEN=17236549).

Mastectomy vs. Lumpectomy (http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/mastectomy-lumpectomy/BC99999).

National Cancer Institute. (2004). Surgery choices for women with early stage breast cancer.

(http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/breast-cancer-surgery-choices).

NexProfiler: Newly diagnosed breast cancer.

(https://www.cancerprofiler.nexcura.com/Secure/InterfaceSecure.asp?CB=259).

Street, R.L. Options for Treating Breast Cancer. College Station, Texas, USA.

Supportive Cancer Care Research Unit HRCC. Decision Board: Breast Cancer Surgery. Hamilton, Ontario.

Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making. (2005). Early Stage Breast Cancer: Choosing Your Surgery.

Boston, USA.

Goel, V., Sawka, C.A., Thiel, E.C., Gort, E.H. & O'Connor, A.M. (2001). Randomized trial of a patient decision aid for choice of surgical treatment for breast cancer. Medical Decision Making 21, 1-6.

Street, R.L. & Voigt, B. (1997). Patient participation in deciding breast cancer treatment and subsequent quality of life.

Medical Decision Making 17, 298-305.

Street, R.L., Voigt, B., Geyer, C., Manning, T. & Swanson, G.P. (1995). Increasing patient involvement in choosing treatment for early breast cancer. Cancer 76, 2275-2285.

Whelan, T., Levine, M., Willan, M., Gafni, A., Sanders, K., MIrsky, D., Chambers, S., O’Brien, M.A., Reid, S. & Dubois, S. (2004). Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 292, 435-441.

Wilkins, E.G., Lowery, L.A., Copeland, S.L., Goldfarb, S.L., Wren, P.A. & Janz, N.K. (2006). Impact of an educational video on patient decision making in early breast cancer treatment. Medical Decision Making 26, 589-598.

O'Connor, A.M., Tugwell, P., Wells, G.A., Elmslie, T., Jolly, E., Hollingworth, G., McPherson, R., Drake, E., Hopman, W. & Mackenzie, T. (1998). Randomized trial of a portable self-administered decision aid for

postmenopausal women considering long-term preventive hormone therapy. Medical Decision Making 18, 295-303.

Jibaja-Weiss, M.L. & Volk, R.J. (2007). Utilizing computerized entertainment education in the development of decision aids for lower literate and naive computer users. Journal of Health Communication 12, 681-697.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs: NJ: Prentice Hall.

Singhal, A. & Rogers, E.M. (2002). A theoretical agenda for entertainment-education. Communication Theory 12,

-135.

Singhal, A. & Rogers, E.M. (1999). Entertainment-Education - A Communication Strategy for Social Change.

Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Vodermaier, A., Caspari, C., Koehm, J., Ditsch, N. & Untch, M. (2009). Contextual factors in shared decision making:

a randomised controlled trial in women with a strong suspicion of breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer 100, 590-597.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5750/ejpch.v1i1.649

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.