Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Listening well to psychiatric service users: What does it mean to give uptake?

Nancy Nyquist Potter

Abstract


Communication is central to good healthcare, with clinician, patient, and family members all playing a key role in identifying the needs and treatment options for the patient. Because good healthcare is person-centered, communication needs also to be person-centered - with the patient as the primary focal point - even though there may be several other parties who have interests and concerns for the patient. But in what does good communication consist? This article delves more deeply into the question of what is entailed in listening well, expanding on the concept of uptake as introduced by J.L. Austin. I apply uptake to psychiatric service users; because of persistent stigma, implicit bias, and stereotyping, this population faces some unique challenges when it comes to being listened to and taken seriously, This is especially true for members of Black, minority and ethnic groups. While the focus of this article is on uptake, I also discuss some kinds of silencing that may be at play in clinical encounters and in co-production. However, many questions are left unanswered as to when and how uptake is properly given, and when, if ever, it should not be given. The final section of this paper speaks to the need for others to engage in research and practical engagements so that this vitally important practice can be taught and employed. Here, I raise a number of questions that need to be addressed in order for a deeper understanding can develop about what it means to give uptake well.


Keywords


Communicator, co-production, epistemology, listener, mechanisms of silencing, person-centered healthcare, silence, voice, uptake

Full Text:

PDF

References


Person-Centred Training and Curriculum Scoping Group and the Special Committee on Professional Practice and Ethics. (2018). Person-centered care: implications for training in psychiatry. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists. Available at: https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/improving-care/campaigning-for-better-mental-health-policy/college-reports/2018-college-reports/cr215.

Austin, J.L. (1962.) How to do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kalathil, J. & Jones, N. (Guest eds.). (2016). Special Issue: Critical underpinnings of user/survivor research and co-production. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 23: 3/4.

Kalathil, J. (2008). Dancing to our own tunes: Reassessing black and minority ethnic mental health service user involvement, 1-52. Available at: www.ccmediagroup.co.uk (last accessed 7 July 2019)

Coldham, T. (2012). Co-production: why Scie is giving a bigger voice to service users and carers. The Guardian Tue 26 Jun 2012.

Potter, N.N. (2016). The Virtue of Defiance and Psychiatric Engagement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, ch. 6.

Potter, N.N. (2000). Giving uptake, Social Theory and Practice 26:3, 479-508.

Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power & Ethics of Knowing. p.5. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Friis, A. (2017). What My Body Remembers, (translated by L. Falk van Rooyen), New York, New York: Soho Crime.

Friis, A. (2017). What My Body Remembers, (translated by L. Falk van Rooyen). p. 202. New York, New York: Soho Crime.

Grasswick, H. (2014). Understanding epistemic normativity in feminist epistemology. In The Ethics of Belief (ed. J. Matheson and R. Vitz.). pp. 216-243. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Potter, N.N. (2009). Mapping the Edges and the In-between: A Critical Analysis of Borderline Personality Disorder. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Stauffer, J. (2015). Ethical Loneliness: The Injustice of not Being Heard. New york: Columbia University Press.

British Broadcasting Corporation One. Shetland. Original release (2013). 2013-present.

Norval A. (2009). Democracy, pluralization, and voice. Ethics & Global Politics 2(4): 297-320.

Code, Lorraine (2008). Advocacy, negotiation, and the politics of unknowing. Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (S1) 32-51.

Root, M. (2001). Hume on the virtues of testimony. American Philosophical Quarterly 38 (1) 19-35.

Dotson K. (2014) Conceptualizing epistemic oppression. Social Epistemology 28 (2) 115-138.

Gutting, G and Oksala, J. (2019). "Michel Foucault", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/foucault/ (last accessed 7 July 2019).

Van Dyne, L., Ang S., and Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies 40 (6) 1359-1392.

Hörberg, U., Sjögren, R. & Dahlberg, K. (2012). To be strategically struggling against resignation: The lived experience of being cared for in forensic psychiatric care. Issues in Mental Health Nursing 33 (11) 743-751.

Sue, D.W., Capodilupo, C.M., Torino, G.C., Bucceri, J.M., Holder, A.M.B., Nadal, K.L. & Esquilin, M. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist 62 (4) 271-286.

Medina, J. (2013). The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and the Social Imagination. p. 95. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Walton, D. (1984). Logical Dialogue-Games and Fallacies. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

Medina, J. (2013). The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and the Social Imagination. p. 250. Oxford: Oxford University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5750/ejpch.v7i3.1757

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.