Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Bridging the second gap in translation: a case study of barriers and facilitators to implementing Patient-initiated Clinics into secondary care

Victoria Goodwin, Jo Day, Richard Byng, Paul McArdle, Eline Kieft


Rationale: Patient-initiated Clinics (PIC) have been found to be safe and have patient and service benefits in terms of satisfaction and cost. This paper reports our experiences of implementing PIC and the practical challenges of translating research into practice.

Methods: The Knowledge to Action framework was used to inform the design of implementation plans in three different departments in one secondary healthcare organisation. A focused ethnographic approach was utilised to collect data on barriers and facilitators to implementation which were analysed using iterative qualitative analytic techniques. The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework was used to develop the analysis and data presentation.

Results: The success of implementation was mixed across the three departments. Despite evidence of effectiveness, contextual issues at a department level, such as empowered leadership and team members, trust in colleagues and patients and capacity to make changes, impacted on the progress of implementation.

Discussion: Patient-initiated Clinics can offer a useful and feasible alternative for follow-up care of some groups of patients with long-term conditions in secondary care and can be implemented through strong leadership and teamwork and a positive attitude to change. Although Implementation Science as an emerging field offers useful tools and theoretical support, its complexity may create additional challenges to implementation of specific interventions and so further contribute to the second gap in translation.


Barriers and facilitators, focused ethnography, implementation, knowledge to action framework, PARiHS framework, Patient-initiated Clinics (PIC), person-centered healthcare

Full Text:



Heaton, J., Day, J. & Britten, N. (2015). Inside the “Black Box” of a Knowledge Translation Program in Applied Health Research. Qualitative Health Research 25 (11) 1477-1491.

Astbury, B. & Leeuw, F.L. (2010). Unpacking Black Boxes: Mechanisms and Theory Building in Evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation 31 (3) 363-381.

Lau, R., Stevenson, F., Ong, B.N., Dziedzic, K., Treweek, S., Eldridge, S., Everitt, H., Kennedy, A., Qureshi, N., Rogers, A., Peacock, R. & Murray, E. (2015). Achieving change in primary care - effectiveness of strategies for improving implementation of complex interventions: systematic review of reviews. BMJ Open 5 (12) e009993.

Morris, Z.S., Wooding, S. & Grant, J. (2011). The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 104 (12) 510-520.

Grimshaw, J., Eccles, M., Lavis, J., Hill, S. & Squires, J. (2012). Knowledge translation of research findings. Implementation Science 7 (1) 50.

Cooksey, S.D. (2006). A review of UK health research funding. Norwich: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.

NHS Right Care. RightCare. (2016). Available from:

Whear, R., Abdul-Rhaman, A-K., Thompson-Coon, J., Boddy, K. & Perry, M. (2013). Patient initiated clinics for patients with chronic or recurrent conditions managed in secondary care: a systematic review of patient reported outcomes and patient and clinician satisfaction. BMC Health Services Research 13, 501.

Whear, R., Abdul-Rhaman, A-K., Boddy, K., Thompson-Coon, J., Perry, M. & Stein, K. (2013). The Clinical Effectiveness of Patient Initiated Clinics for Patients with Chronic or Recurrent Conditions Managed in Secondary Care: A Systematic Review. PLoS One 8, 10.

Taneja, A., Su’a, B. & Hill, A.G. (2014). Efficacy of patient-initiated follow-up clinics in secondary care: a systematic review. Internal Medicine Journal 44, 1156-1160.

Graham, I.D., Logan, J., Harrison, M.B., Straus, S.E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W. & Robinson, N. (2006). Lost in Knowledge Translation: Time for a Map? Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 26, 13-24.

Tracy, S.J. (2010). Qualitative Quality: Eight ''Big-Tent'' Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry 16 (10) 837-851.

Higginbottom, G.M.A., Pillay, J.J. & Boadu, N.Y. (2013). Guidance on Performing Focused Ethnographies with an Emphasis on Healthcare Research. The Qualitative Report 18 (Article 17) 1-16.

Cruz, E. & Higginbottom, G.M. (2013). The use of focused ethnography in nursing research. Nursing Researcher 20 (4) 36-43.

Nightingale, R. & Sinha, M.V.S. (2014). Using focused ethnography in paediatric settings to explore professionals' and parents' attitudes towards expertise in managing chronic kidney disease stage 3-5. BMC Health Services Research 1, 403.

Kuper, A., Lingard, L. & Levinson, W. (2008). Critically appraising qualitative research. British Medical Journal 337, a1035.

Pope, C., Ziebland, S. & Mays, N. (2000). Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. British Medical Journal 320,114-116.

Blaxter, M. (1996). Criteria For The Evaluation Of Qualitative Research Papers. Medical Sociology News 22 (1).

Stetler, C., Damschroder, L., Helfrich, C. & Hagedorn, H. (2011). A Guide for applying a revised version of the PARIHS framework for implementation. Implementation Science 6 (1) 99.

Kitson, A., Rycroft-Malone, J., Harvey, G., McCormack, B., Seers, K. & Titchen, A. (2008). Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges. Implementation Science 3 (1) 1.

Helfrich, C., Damschroder, L., Hagedorn, H., Daggett, G.S., Sahay, A., Ritchie, M., Damush, T., Guihan, M., Ulrich, P.M. & Stetler, C.B. (2010). A critical synthesis of literature on the promoting action on research implementation in health services (PARIHS) framework. Implementation Science 5 (1) 82.

Rycroft-Malone, J., Kitson, A., Harvey, G., McCormack, B., Seers, K., Titchen, A. & Estabrooks, C. (2002). Ingredients for change: revisiting a conceptual framework. Quality and Safety in Health Care 11 (2) 174-180.

Kitson, A., Harvey, G. & McCormack, B. (1998). Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework. Quality in Health Care 7 (3) 149-158.

McCullough, M., Chou, A., Solomon, J., Petrakis, B., Kim, B., Park, A., Benedict, A., Hamilton, A. & Rose, A. (2015). The interplay of contextual elements in implementation: an ethnographic case study. BMC Health Services Research 15 (1) 62.

Lavis, J.N., Robertson, D., Woodside, J.M., McLeod, C.B., Abelson, J & Knowledge Transfer Study Group. (2003). How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers? Milbank Quarterly 81 (2) 221-248, 171-172.

Tabak, R.G., Khoong, E.C., Chambers, D. & Brownson, R.C. (2013). Models in dissemination and implementation research: useful tools in public health services and systems research. Frontiers in Public Health Services & Systems Research 2 (1).

Quality Enhancement Research Initiative. (2013). Implementation Guide. Washington DC: Department of Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research & Development.

Ward, V.L., House, A.O. & Hamer, S. (2009). Knowledge brokering: Exploring the process of transferring knowledge into action. BMC Health Services Research 9 (1) 1-6.

National Institute for Health Research. (2015). World class research making a difference. Leicester: NIHR CLAHRC East Midlands.

Phipps, D. (2011). The PARiHS framework (Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services). Available from:

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2007). How to change practice. Understand, identify and overcome barriers to change. London: NICE.

Cane, J., O'Connor, D. & Michie, S. (2012). Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implementation Science 7 (1) 37.

Michie, S., van Stralen, M. & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science 6 (1) 42.

Ehrhart, M., Aarons, G. & Farahnak, L. (2014). Assessing the organizational context for EBP implementation: the development and validity testing of the Implementation Climate Scale (ICS). Implementation Science 9 (1) 157.

Damschroder, L., Aron, D., Keith, R., Kirsh, S., Alexander, J. & Lowery, J. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science 4 (1) 50.

Bartholomew, L.K., Parcel, G.S., Kok, G., Gottlieb, N.H. & Fernandez, M.E. (2011). Planning health promotion programs. An intervention mapping approach. 3 edn. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass. A Wiley Imprint.

van Bokhoven, M.A., Kok, G. & van der Weijden, T. (2003). Designing a quality improvement intervention: a systematic approach. Quality and Safety in Health Care 12 (3) 215-220.

May, C. (2013). Towards a general theory of implementation. Implementation Science 8, 18.

Child, S., Goodwin, V.A., Perry, M.G., Gericke, C.A. & Byng, R. (2015). Implementing a patient-initiated review system in rheumatoid arthritis: a qualitative evaluation. BMC Health Services Research 15, 157.

Rycroft-Malone, J. (2004). The PARiHS Framework - A Framework for Guiding the Implementation of Evidence-based Practice. Journal of Nursing Care Quality 19 (4) 297-304.

Hewlett, S., Kirwan, J., Pollock, J., Mitchell, K., Hehir, M., Blair, P.S., Memel, D. & Perry, M.G. (2004). Patient initiated outpatient follow up in rheumatoid arthritis: six year randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal 330 (7484) 171.



  • There are currently no refbacks.